2 + 2 = 4

Why am I still the best example of a result of a logical conclusion of abstract data. Is it because I am the same when multiplied or added? Is it because of George Orwell and its use of 2 + 2 = 5? I’ve met 2 + 2 = 5. It’s a pretty cool process. It equals a lot, knows a lot, and people don’t expect it to uphold some constant of the perfect metaphor for an expected result when summing all abstract data. This consumes them like it does me until you think about it over and over and over again.